Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/10/28
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Cambodia - Health Equity and Quality Improvement
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 19
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- KH-Cambodia Health Equity And Quality Improvement Project (H-Eqip) -- P157291
- TF No/Name
- TF0A2562-PHRD PRIME - Health Equity and Quality Improvement Project,TF0A3114-Cambodia Health Equity and Quality Improvement Project,TF0A3289-MDTF BE Cambodia Health Equity and Quality Improvement Project (H-EQIP),TF0A3819-PHRD PRIME - Health Equity and Quality Improvement Project (Bank superv,TF0A9492-Cambodia Health MDTF (Health Equity and Quality Improvement Project) Re
- Unit Owning
- Health Nutrition&Population EAP1 (HEAH1)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
- Date of Board Approval 2
- Strengthening Health Service Delivery 2
- Improving Financial Protection and Equit 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Ensuring Sustainable and Responsive Health System 3
- Contingent Emergency Response component CERC 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
- Rationale 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Rating 5
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
- OBJECTIVE 1 5
- Objective 5
- Rationale 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- Outputs and intermediate outcomes 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Outcomes 7
- Rating 7
- OBJECTIVE 1 REVISION 1 7
- Revised Objective 7
- Revised Rationale 7
- Revised Rating 7
- OBJECTIVE 2 7
- Objective 7
- Rationale 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Outputs and intermediate outcomes 8
- Outcomes 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- Rating 9
- OBJECTIVE 3 9
- Objective 9
- Rationale 9
- Outcomes 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Rating 10
- OBJECTIVE 4 10
- Objective 10
- Rationale 10
- Rating 10
- OVERALL EFFICACY 10
- Rationale 10
- Overall Efficacy Rating 10
- OVERALL EFFICACY REVISION 1 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rationale 11
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rating 11
- 5. Efficiency 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- Efficiency Rating 12
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 12
- 6. Outcome 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- Outcome Rating 13
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 13
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- Quality of Supervision Rating 15
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 15
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- ME Quality Rating 16
- 10. Other Issues 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- 11. Ratings 17
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
- 12. Lessons 18
- Long-standing engagement in a country and sector can allow lessons and learning from previous support to be adapted and re-implemented 18
- Building and strengthening capacity ultimately pays off 18
- There is a sometimes difficult balance between equity and quality in a health system. 18
- Improvements in health services quality do not translate automatically into higher utilization of the public health system 18
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 19
- 13. Assessment Recommended 19
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 19
