Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/10/28
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Congo, Democratic Republic of - Forest Dependent Communities Support Pr.
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 17
- Product Line
- Recipient Executed Activities
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- ZR-Forest Dependent Communities Support Project -- P149049
- TF No/Name
- TF0A5550-RETF for CAFI AF to Forest Dependent Community Support Project,TF0B2634-HRDTF - DRC - Indigenous Peoples,TF0A0924-DGM in DRC - Forest Dependent Community Support Project,TF0A4395-NTF#2 - Action Plan for a rights-based Indigenous Peoples development p,TF0B6046-BETF FOR FOREST DEPENDENT COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROJECT,TF0B8166-CBP IN DRC - PHASE 3
- Unit Owning
- AFR ENR PM 3 (SAEE3)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Reinforce the Participation of IPLC in Forest and Land Management Processes Related to REDD 2
- Support Community-based Sustainable Forest and Land Management 2
- Increase the Capacity to Implement Development Activities for IPLC and Consolidate Feedback 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Project Cost 3
- Financing 3
- Borrower Contribution 3
- Dates 3
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 3
- Rationale 3
- Country Context 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- PDO alignment to Country priorities 4
- Bank experience in the sector 4
- PDO alignment to World Bank Strategies 4
- PDO Level 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Rating 5
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
- Objective 5
- Rationale 5
- Theory of Change ToC 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- Outputs 6
- Outcomes 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Rating 7
- Objective 7
- Rationale 7
- Outputs 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Outcomes 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- Rating 9
- Rationale 9
- Overall Efficacy Rating 9
- 5. Efficiency 9
- Economic and Financial Efficiency 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Administrative Efficiency 10
- Efficiency Rating 10
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 10
- 6. Outcome 10
- Outcome Rating 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 11
- Government Ownership Risk 11
- Resource Conflict Risks 11
- Financial Risk 11
- Environmental Risk 11
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- DGM stakeholders increased role in REDD processes 12
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- Quality of Supervision Rating 13
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 13
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- ME Quality Rating 14
- 10. Other Issues 14
- OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment 14
- OP 4.10 Indigenous Peoples 14
- OP 4.04 Natural Habitats and OP4.36 Forests. 14
- Involuntary Resettlement OPBP 4.12 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- Grievance Redress Mechanism GRM. 15
- OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources 15
- Financial Management 15
- Procurement 15
- 11. Ratings 15
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- 12. Lessons 16
- Adequate fiduciary capacity of implementing agencies is critical for continuation of community development and capacity development efforts. 16
- Digital monitoring platforms and third-party monitoring can overcome both capacity and accessibility challenges for project teams. 16
- Extended preparation time and project preparation grants can support smoother implementation with partners that are newly engaged. 16
- 13. Assessment Recommended 16
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
