to be completed at the partners’ Analyse the extent of the Portals’ The evaluator will propose the convenience, thereby minimising adaptation to and integration with local most effective methods to meet the non-engagement risks and ensuring systems. [...] Consequently, OBJEC TIVE 2 : it will not be possible to assess the long-term impact of various Portal Evaluate the efficiency of the implementation process webpage designs on the volume of Review the steps taken to establish the Reporting Portals and assess reports submitted to the Portals. [...] The limited timeframe for Identify barriers to Portal usage the evaluation necessitates a focus Understand the level of usage and in-country awareness of the Reporting on more immediate and achievable Portals and identify the key challenges and barriers preventing effective objectives, precluding a broader reporting of CSAM through these platforms. [...] It is expected that the evaluator outcomes and impact has resources are needed to increase will ensure that the purpose of the case studies the Reporting Portals project the impact of the Reporting is clearly defined to apply the most appropriate achieved? Portals in the targeted countries? selection criteria. [...] group discussions (FGDs) to gather will involve a deeper dive into sessions to validate evaluation in-depth perspectives on the the implementation, usage, and findings and provide feedback on challenges and successes of the outcomes of the Portals and will emerging recommendations.
- Pages
- 11
- Published in
- United Kingdom
Table of Contents
- Evaluation of IWFs Reporting Portals 1
- PROJECT BACKGROUND THE IWF SEEKS AN EXTERNAL EVALUATION PARTNER TO 2
- These portals offer a safe and anonymous reporting mechanism for over 2.7 billion people in more than 54 countries. 2
- The evaluation is expected to take approximately 10 months and must be completed no later than December 2025. 2
- PAST MONITORING AND EVALUATION ACTIVITIES 3
- EVALUATION PURPOSE 3
- Additionally IWF is committed to hosting the Portals and processing the reports received in perpetuity. IWF will consider improvements to the Portals based on outcomes from this evaluation. 3
- EVALUATION SCOPE 4
- IN SCOPE 4
- OUT OF SCOPE 5
- Evaluation objectives 5
- OBJECTIVE 1 5
- OBJECTIVE 2 5
- OBJECTIVE 3 5
- OBJECTIVE 4 5
- KEY EVALUATION QUESTIONS 6
- EVALUATION DESIGN 6
- Evaluation questions design and methodology 6
- METHODOLOGY THEORY OF CHANGE 7
- In summary reconstructing the Theory of Change will enable the independent evaluator to develop a robust analytical framework for evaluating the Portals project. 7
- EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 8
- ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 9
- GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY 9
- EVALUATION DELIVER ABLES AND OUTPUTS 10
- PROPOSED PROJECT TIMELINE 10
- EVALUATION PROCESS 11
- SUBMISSION 11
- PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT 11
- HOW TO APPLY 11
- BUDGET 11
