Famine Review Committee: - Review of the Famine Earl y Warni

following the Famine reviews of December 2023 and The review by the FRC is a neutral and independent March 2024, the IPC Global Steering waived the need process aimed at supporting IPC quality assurance and to conduct Step 1 of the Famine review – preparation ensuring technical rigour and neutrality of the analysis. [...] At the analysis, the FRC was activated at the end of April and time of that IPC analysis and based on the best available received the FEWS NET analysis for review on 10 May information on the expected delivery of food and other 2024. [...] Important drivers of Famine While the use of assumptions and inference is standard risk include the intensity of the ongoing conflict, the practice in IPC generally, the limitations of the available killing of humanitarian staff, the continued lack of body of evidence and the extent of its convergence adherence to International Humanitarian Law, the lack for northern Gaza in April leads to a very. [...] While FEWS NET estimated the In particular, the FRC highlights several issues caloric availability in the area as covering only 59- contributing to a high level of uncertainty regarding 63% of the needs (based uniquely on Humanitarian food availability in the Governorates of Gaza and North Food Assistance) in April, the review done by the Gaza in April 2024. [...] NET choice of maintaining the estimates for the total Following the FRC request to integrate this information population of northern Gaza as well as the distribution into the analysis, FEWSNET added the missing deliveries of the remaining population across the Gaza and in particular: North Gaza governorates that was used in the last IPC and FRC analyses for the Gaza Strip.