cover image: RECOGNISING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF REDUCING CHILD POVERTY BY SCRAPPING THE TWO-CHILD LIMIT AND THE BENEFIT CAP

RECOGNISING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF REDUCING CHILD POVERTY BY SCRAPPING THE TWO-CHILD LIMIT AND THE BENEFIT CAP

18 Oct 2024

The erosion of the income safety net left households with little, if any, financial security on the eve of the pandemic – 31% of families could not afford a decent standard of living in December 2019.3 Among the most egregious of these cuts are the two-child limit and benefit cap. [...] Despite the economic turbulence of the 2008 crash, a decade of austerity, the pandemic and now the cost of living crisis, the OBR’s social security multiplier has remained at its starting point of 0.6 since 2010.17 This is in part driven by the range of views on the appropriate magnitude of multipliers.18 That the variation in the output gap has little, if any, effect on the size of the OBR fiscal. [...] Table 4: The cost of child poverty will be 7.1% lower if the caps are scrapped in 2025/26 Reduction in the cost of child poverty if the two-child limit and benefit cap are scrapped, percentage of children benefitting and percentage of children in poverty gaining in 2025/26 Reduction in cost Children in poverty Area Children gaining of child poverty gaining North East £140,000,000 13.3% 34.4% North. [...] 20 Capping ambitions To signal the serious intent of the government, the publication of the child poverty strategy in the spring will inevitably require a recommendation to end the two-child limit, with the detrimental contribution of the benefit cap on incomes and wellbeing at least significantly addressed. [...] But with an additional 109 children pulled into poverty by the two-child limit every day since the election and the impact of the benefit cap increasing with large and sustained rent hikes, the government should not wait until the spring to make this decision.28, 29 The government should confidently make the case that ending these policies is not only the right thing to do morally, but also econom.

Authors

Jessie Bernard

Related Organizations

Pages
24
Published in
United Kingdom

Table of Contents