Authors
Benjamin A. Olken, Rema Hanna, Phitawat Poonpolkul, Nada Wasi
Related Organizations
- Acknowledgements & Disclosure
- Author names are in random order using the AEA author randomization tool. We thank Amy Finkelstein and Krislert Samphantharak for helpful comments. All views are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions or individuals acknowledged here. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Benjamin A. Olken The Bank of Thailand provided data access for this project. Our co-authors are Bank of Thailand employees. I am a director of J-PAL at MIT, the Co-Scientific Director of J-PAL Southeast Asia, and Co-Director of J-PAL’s Social Protection Initiative. J-PAL has no stake in the outcomes of any given evaluation results. However, J-PAL does have a position on what is considered a rigorous evaluation methodology. I serve as the Editor of American Economic Journal: Applied Economics for the American Economic Association, and the Co-Director of the Development Economics Program for the National Bureau of Economic Research. I receive compensation for both of these activities.
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3386/w33096
- Pages
- 41
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- Introduction 3
- Context, Program and Data 7
- The Thai Social Security Scheme 7
- Cash Payments for Informal Workers and Article 40 8
- Data 9
- Incentive impacts on enrollment and retention 10
- Enrollment 10
- Retention 11
- Take-up and insurance choice problems 12
- A model of demand for insurance 13
- Model framework 13
- Taking the model to the data 15
- Insurance take-up 16
- Insurance option choices 17
- Conclusion 19
- Supplementary figures and tables 28
- Calculation of Article 40's expected benefits 38