cover image: Unwarranted Disparity in High-Stakes Decisions: Race Measurement and Policy Responses

Unwarranted Disparity in High-Stakes Decisions: Race Measurement and Policy Responses

1 Nov 2024

Studies of racial discrimination often condition on endogenous measures of race or on earlier decisions that might themselves be affected by discrimination. We develop quasi-experimental tools for estimating the impact of racial misclassification on measures of unwarranted disparity, and for designing policy responses to unwarranted disparity that account for discrimination in earlier decisions. We apply these tools to the setting of child protective services (CPS), where previous work in our context has found that Black children are placed into foster care at higher rates than white children with identical potential for future maltreatment. CPS investigators misclassify 8–9% of Black and white children relative to their self-reported race, and this misclassification obscures around 24% of unwarranted disparity in foster care placement decisions. Policies that use algorithmic recommendations to eliminate total unwarranted disparity in placement rates are also meaningfully affected by earlier discrimination in CPS call screening.
econometrics public economics estimation methods labor economics labor studies poverty and wellbeing health, education, and welfare demography and aging children and families

Authors

E. Jason Baron, Joseph J. Doyle Jr., Natalia Emanuel, Peter Hull, Joseph P. Ryan

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
We thank Randall Akee, Lawrence Katz, Elizabeth Linos, Mark Loewenstein, and other participants in the Summer 2023 CRIW Pre-Conference and Spring 2024 CRIW Conference for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w33104
Pages
34
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All