cover image: Central Bank Information or Neo-Fisher Effect?

Central Bank Information or Neo-Fisher Effect?

7 Nov 2024

The neo-Fisher effect and the central bank information (CBI) effect produce similar outcomes: under both, a monetary tightening triggers an increase in inflation and an expansion in real activity. Separate estimates of these effects run the risk of confounding one with the other. To disentangle these two channels, we introduce into a new-Keynesian model a permanent monetary shock that generates neo-Fisher effects and an aggregate demand shock to which the central bank responds that creates CBI effects. We estimate the model on U.S. data. We find that the neo-Fisherian shock is an important driver of inflation, while the CBI shock explains a significant fraction of movements in the nominal interest rate. The CBI shock explains little of inflation and output, but, through counterfactual exercises, we establish that this reflects the central bank's success in isolating the economy from aggregate demand disturbances. These results are shown to hold under full and imperfect information.
monetary policy business cycles macroeconomics monetary economics economic fluctuations and growth international finance and macroeconomics

Authors

Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé, Martín Uribe

Related Organizations

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w33136
Pages
31
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All