Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/11/13
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- India - BRRP
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 19
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- IN-Bihar Rural Roads Project -- P155522
- TF No/Name
- Optimizing Resource Efficiency in Road Sector in India,Assessment of PMGSY to improve its design and implementation,TF0A4094-Rural Road Safety Management in India
- Unit Owning
- Transport - SAR - AFG, PK & IND (ISAT2)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
- Component 1 Rural Roads Improvement Allocation at approval US320 million Actual cost at completion US211 million. 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Project cost. 3
- Restructuring 1 September 22 2020 3
- Restructuring 3 December 21 2022 3
- Restructuring 4 June 27 2023 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- Restructuring 5 December 26 2023 4
- Financing. 4
- Borrower contribution. 4
- Dates 4
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
- Rationale 4
- Context at appraisal. 4
- Relevance to Government Strategies. 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Relevance to Bank Strategies. 5
- Rating 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 6
- OBJECTIVE 1 6
- Objective 6
- Rationale 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Outputs 7
- Outcomes 7
- Achievement of PDO indicators. 7
- Rating 7
- OBJECTIVE 1 REVISION 1 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Revised Objective 8
- Revised Rationale 8
- Achievement of PDO indicators. 8
- Revised Rating 8
- OBJECTIVE 2 8
- Objective 8
- Rationale 8
- Theory of Change - 8
- Outputs 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- Outcomes 9
- Achievement of PDO indicators. 9
- Rating 9
- OBJECTIVE 2 REVISION 1 9
- Revised Objective 9
- Revised Rationale 9
- Outputs 9
- Outcome 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Revised Rating 10
- OVERALL EFFICACY 10
- Rationale 10
- Overall Efficacy Rating Primary Reason 10
- OVERALL EFFICACY REVISION 1 10
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rationale 10
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rating 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- 5. Efficiency 11
- Economic efficiency 11
- At appraisal 11
- At completion 11
- Cost Effectiveness Administrative and Operational Efficiency 11
- Efficiency Rating 11
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- 6. Outcome 12
- Outcome Rating 12
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 13
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- Quality of Supervision Rating 14
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 14
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- ME Quality Rating 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- 10. Other Issues 16
- Environmental and Social Safeguards. 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- 11. Ratings 17
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 17
- 12. Lessons 17
- Strengthening institutions requires long term engagement and strong government commitment and thus a programmatic approach may be better suited for such projects. 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
- Strong and flexible Bank support is required where the implementing agency and the sector has significant capacity gaps. 18
- Innovative road rehabilitation methods can bring benefits but their sustainability need to be monitored over time. 18
- Building trust through close consultations with communities can improve efficiencies in project implementation. 18
- The adequacy and appropriateness of technology should be assessed against the specific contexts and environments in which it is used. 18
- 13. Assessment Recommended 18
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 18
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 19
