Viet Nam - Vietnam HCFC Phaseout Project Stage II (English)

Table of Contents

• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
• 1. Project Data 1
• Project ID Project Name 1
• Country Practice AreaLead 1
• LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
• Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
• IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
• Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
• 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
• DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
• Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
• Date of Board Approval 2
• Component 1 HCFC Consumption Reduction appraisal estimate US13.56 million actual US5.07 million 2
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
• Component 2 Technical Assistance and Policy Actions appraisal estimate US406801 actual US314177 3
• Component 3 Project Management appraisal estimate US678001 actual US624784 3
• Project Cost 3
• Financing 3
• Borrower Contribution 3
• Dates 3
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
• 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
• Rationale 4
• Countryregion and sector context. 4
• Alignment with the Government strategy. 4
• Alignment with the World Bank strategy. 4
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
• Rating 5
• 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
• OBJECTIVE 1 5
• Objective 5
• Rationale 5
• Theory of change 5
• Outputs 5
• Outcomes 5
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
• Rating 6
• OBJECTIVE 1 REVISION 1 6
• Revised Objective 6
• Revised Rationale 6
• Outputs 6
• Outcomes 6
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
• Revised Rating 7
• OBJECTIVE 2 7
• Objective 7
• Rationale 7
• Theory of Change 7
• Outputs 7
• Outcomes 7
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
• Rating 8
• OBJECTIVE 2 REVISION 1 8
• Revised Objective 8
• Revised Rationale 8
• Outputs 8
• Outcomes 8
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
• Revised Rating 9
• OVERALL EFFICACY 9
• Rationale 9
• Overall Efficacy Rating Primary Reason 9
• OVERALL EFFICACY REVISION 1 9
• Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rationale 9
• Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rating 9
• 5. Efficiency 9
• Economic efficiency 9
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
• Operational efficiency 10
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
• Efficiency Rating 11
• Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 11
• 6. Outcome 11
• Original project 11
• Revised project 11
• Original Targets Revised Targets 11
• Relevance 11
• Objective 1 11
• Objective 2 11
• Efficacy 11
• Efficiency 11
• Outcome rating 11
• Numerical value of outcome rating 11
• Disbursement USm 11
• Share of disbursement 11
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
• Weighted value of the outcome rating 12
• Final Outcome rating a. 12
• Outcome Rating 12
• 7. Risk to Development Outcome 12
• 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 12
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
• Quality-at-Entry Rating 13
• Quality of Supervision Rating 13
• Overall Bank Performance Rating 13
• 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 13
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
• ME Quality Rating 14
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
• 10. Other Issues 15
• Procurement 15
• Financial Management 15
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
• 11. Ratings 16
• Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 16
• 12. Lessons 16
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
• Providing continuous training and capacity activities for project beneficiaries and partner agencies can positively impact the sustainability of outcomes beyond the project. 17
• 13. Assessment Recommended 17
• 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 17
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18