In addition to the significant structural challenge of deploying GGR at the requisite scale to reach the 1.5°C target, segments of the population are ambivalent about the technology and grapple with the role technological GGR should play in a decarbonisation strategy (Cox et al., 2020). [...] Why are MRV frameworks needed? The credibility of emission reduction claims is integral to the functioning of the GGR sector and has implications for wider societal trust in the need to utilise GGR techniques to reduce the concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere. [...] The increased use of principles (such as the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s core carbon principles) and better information architecture – such as credit ratings and better integration of data and disclosures pertaining to issuance, credit price, vintage and retirement date – have the potential to bolster trust in GGR project developers and certain classes of GGR (Smith et al.,. [...] Even if the expectations for monitoring accuracy need to be dampened, and the policy frames adapted accordingly (such as not allowing the integration of GGR into conventional carbon markets or having separate targets for GGR and mitigation), ensuring that emissions are accurately measured, reported to regulators, and verified will remain critical to the healthy functioning of the sector and wider. [...] Subsurface CO₂ storage11 The critical challenge for the MRV of CO₂ injection is the need to accurately quantify the CO₂ stored in a reservoir and the stability of the CO₂ plume over time.
Authors
Related Organizations
- Pages
- 47
- Published in
- United Kingdom
Table of Contents
- Summary 1 3
- 1. Introduction 9 3
- 2. Why are MRV frameworks needed? 13 3
- 3. Market demand for carbon removals and the pace of MRV innovation 15 3
- 4. What does the current science look like for different types of GGR? 17 3
- 5. A snapshot of the MRV landscape for GGR 28 3
- 6. Relative risk matrix 32 3
- 7. Recommendations for advancing MRV for greenhouse gas removal 34 3
- 8. Conclusions 39 3
- Appendix 1. Relative risk matrix for MRV for greenhouse gas removal – greyscale version 40 3
- References 41 3
- Summary 4
- Why are greenhouse gas removals needed? 5
- Growing momentum for GGR 5
- Robust MRV for upscaling GGR 5
- Mapping current MRV to highlight features and gaps 6
- Key features 6
- Priority areas and recommendations to advance MRV for GGR 9
- Conclusions 11
- Key messages 4
- High-level recommendations 4
- 1. Introduction 12
- Why are greenhouse gas removals needed? 12
- Growing momentum for GGR 13
- Why monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) is key to building trust in GGR 13
- Structure of the report 15
- Terminology 12
- 2. Why are MRV frameworks needed? 16
- A GGR market with integrity by design 16
- A variety of monitoring challenges 16
- Recognising the limitations of MRV 17
- 3. Market demand for carbon removals and the pace of MRV innovation 18
- Delivered and committed market demand for carbon removals 18
- Innovation in MRV 19
- 4. What does the current science look like for different types of GGR? 20
- Overview 20
- Direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) 20
- Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) 21
- Subsurface CO₂ storage10F10F 22
- Afforestation and reforestation 24
- Peatland and wetland restoration 25
- Biochar 26
- Soil carbon sequestration (SCS) 27
- Enhanced rock weathering (ERW) 28
- Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) 29
- Ocean fertilisation 29
- 5. A snapshot of the MRV landscape for GGR 31
- Caveats 31
- Key observations 32
- 6. Relative risk matrix 35
- Durability of MRV 35
- Scalability of MRV 35
- 7. Recommendations for advancing MRV for greenhouse gas removal 37
- Foundational science 37
- Cost of MRV 37
- Liability for GGR credits 38
- MRV is being undermined by disparate actors and protocols 39
- An MRV regulator 40
- Managing MRV risk 41
- 8. Conclusions 42
- Appendix 1. Relative risk matrix for MRV for greenhouse gas removal – greyscale version 43
- References 44