Fossil fuel financing from the world’s 60
largest banks has reached USD $4.6 trillion
in the six years since the adoption of the Paris
Agreement, with $742 billion in fossil fuel
financing in 2021 alone. This report examines
commercial and investment bank financing
for the fossil fuel industry — aggregating their
leading roles in lending and underwriting debt
and equity issuances — and finds that even
in a year where net-zero commitments were
all the rage, the financial sector continued its
business-as-usual driving of climate chaos.
Fossil fuel financing plateaued last year,
amid a lagging recovery from the COVID-19
pandemic — yet at levels still higher than in
2016, the first year after the Paris Agreement
was adopted. These findings underscore the
need for banks to immediately implement
policies that end their financing for fossil fuel
expansion and begin to zero out their support
altogether.
Overall fossil fuel financing remains dominated
by four U.S. banks — JPMorgan Chase, Citi,
Wells Fargo, and Bank of America — who
together account for one quarter of all fossil
fuel financing identified over the last six years.
RBC is Canada’s worst banker of fossil fuels,
with Barclays as the worst in Europe and MUFG
as the worst in Japan.
These banks may tout their commitments to
helping their clients transition, and yet the 60
banks profiled in this report funneled $185.5
billion just last year into the 100 companies
doing the most to expand the fossil fuel sector,
such as Saudi Aramco and ExxonMobil —
even when carbon budgets make clear that we
cannot afford any new coal, gas, or oil supply
or infrastructure.
Banking on Climate Chaos 2022 also assesses
bank financing for top companies in certain
spotlight fossil fuel sectors, and highlights the
communities fighting projects in these sectors
that threaten their lives and livelihoods.