The March 2022 report from the Platform provided experts’ guidance on how 2 to define technical screening criteria, comprising a clear commitment to and transparent rationale for excluding offsets in general (part A of the report) and very specifically for the Conservation activity: "5.2 The conservation activity is not implemented with the purpose of offsetting the impact of another economic acti. [...] In fact, producing biobased feedstock can be intensely linear and may increase the use of natural resources (such as water and soil), increase the amount of hazardous chemicals used and released to the environment (such as pesticides and fertilisers) and increase the incineration of waste if the packaging produced is single-use. [...] “Components and materials used in the construction do not contain asbestos nor substances of very high concern as identified on the list of substances subject to authorisation set out in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council unless authorised or exempted for the specific use through the appropriate processes in REACH.” This is setting the baseline. [...] “Components and materials used in the construction do not contain asbestos nor substances of very high concern as identified on the list of substances subject to authorisation set out in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council unless authorised or exempted for the specific use through the appropriate processes in REACH.” We are now setting the baseli. [...] Climate Strategy: Consistently, need for a DNSH criterion worded in such a way to “ensure that energy saving has been considered in the context of the renovation activity, and that risks of building falling out of compliance with minimum performance standards in the context of the recast EPBD (2023) are contemplated in the renovation.” In addition, given that the DNSH for circularity in the renova.
- Pages
- 36
- Published in
- Belgium
