The North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) initial response to Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine signaled a
commitment to strengthening deterrence and defense posture. Yet, the conflict highlighted capability gaps, readiness
shortfalls and problem points across the alliance, including ever more contested logistics, vulnerable transport
infrastructure, and growing energy insecurity. The need to meet these looming and often-overlooked challenges is acute.
Left unchecked, they could weaken the alliance’s collective resilience and undercut efforts to provide continuous
military support to Ukraine, stopping the military momentum on the ground from shifting decisively in its favor.
One fundamental component of warfighting capability underpinning all others is operational energy broadly and fuel
specifically, both in peacetime and wartime. Efforts to increase the readiness and enablement of NATO forces should
therefore explicitly take into consideration the logistics implications and the compounding effects of rising logistics
requirements, including fuel. Enhanced ability to operate in contested environments as well as maintaining forward
defense on NATO’s eastern flank will result in higher fuel consumption and, in turn, will require a larger logistics footprint.
Thus, increasing operational energy capabilities, including storage and distribution, and reducing risks associated with the
lack of or dependence on vulnerable supply lines are critical supporting capabilities for the future fight.
Authors
- Published in
- United States of America