cover image: The Global Life-Cycle Optimizer – Analyzing Fiscal Policy's Potential to Dramatically Distort Labor Supply and Saving

20.500.12592/q573thv

The Global Life-Cycle Optimizer – Analyzing Fiscal Policy's Potential to Dramatically Distort Labor Supply and Saving

11 Apr 2024

Fiscal policy in the U.S. and other countries renders intertemporal budgets non-differentiable, nonconvex, and discontinuous. Consequently, assessing work and saving responses to policy requires global optimization. This paper develops the Global Life-Cycle Optimizer (GLO), a stochastic pattern-search algorithm. The GLO robustly, precisely, and quickly locates global optima in highly complex fiscal settings. We use the GLO to study how a stylized U.S. fiscal system distorts workers’ labor supply and saving assuming standard preferences. The system incorporates kinks from federal personal income tax brackets, Social Security’s FICA tax, and a notch from the provision of basic income below a threshold. The GLO reproduces theoretically predicted earnings bunching and flipping over a remarkably wide range of wage rates. Saving distortions can be equally dramatic. Associated excess burdens range from substantial to massive. Restricting labor supply to full-or part-time work can eliminate flipping when it’s optimal and produce flipping when it’s suboptimal. Joint filing can significantly reduce the earnings of lower-wage spouses relative to that of higher-wage spouses. The GLO can be applied to assess a country’s or state’s full set of work and saving disincentives. Consequently, it can facilitate analyses of structural labor supply and tax reform.
taxation public economics labor economics labor studies labor supply and demand poverty and wellbeing health, education, and welfare

Authors

Johannes Brumm, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Christopher Krause

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
We thank Robert Moffitt, Yongyang Cai, Philip Jung, and participants at the Boston University macroeconomics faculty research seminar for helpful suggestions and the European Research Council, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Economic Security Planning, Inc., the Goodman Institute, and Boston University for research support. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32335
Published in
United States of America

Related Topics

All