cover image: Codification, Technology Absorption, and the Globalization of the Industrial Revolution

20.500.12592/3pzdw0p

Codification, Technology Absorption, and the Globalization of the Industrial Revolution

11 Jul 2024

This paper studies technology absorption worldwide in the late nineteenth century. We construct several novel datasets to test the idea that the codification of technical knowledge in the vernacular was necessary for countries to absorb the technologies of the Industrial Revolution. We find that comparative advantage shifted to industries that could benefit from patents only in countries and colonies that had access to codified technical knowledge but not in other regions. Using the rapid and unprecedented codification of technical knowledge in Meiji Japan as a natural experiment, we show that this pattern appeared in Japan only after the Japanese government codified as much technical knowledge as what was available in Germany in 1870. Our findings shed new light on the frictions associated with technology diffusion and offer a novel take on why Meiji Japan was unique among non-Western countries in successfully industrializing during the first wave of globalization.
trade history international trade and investment development economics international economics development of the american economy macroeconomic history globalization and international relations

Authors

Réka Juhász, Shogo Sakabe, David Weinstein

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
We give special thanks to Chris Meissner and John Tang for sharing their trade data for Belgium and Japan. We thank Benjamin Eyal, Isaac Loomis, Zachary Marcone, Ojaswee Rajbhandari, Roshan Setlur, Alex Zhang, and especially Michael Duarte, Verónica C. Pérez, Angela Wu, and Dongcheng Yang for excellent research assistance. We also want to thank Treb Allen, Andrew Bernard, Kirill Borusyak, Florian Caro, Davin Chor, John Fernald, Shizuka Inoue, Takatoshi Ito, Chiaki Moriguchi, Robert Staiger, Jón Steinsson, and Dan Trefler for their excellent comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32667
Pages
66
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All