cover image: For attention: Mr Nhlamulo Mathye

For attention: Mr Nhlamulo Mathye

30 Aug 2024

The ever-present possibility of a motion of no confidence against the President and the Cabinet is meant to keep the President accountable to the Assembly which elects her or him.”3 2.5. [...] Similarly, in UDM the Constitutional Court held that – “A motion of no confidence constitutes a threat of the ultimate sanction the National Assembly can impose on the President and Cabinet should they fail or be perceived to have failed to carry out their constitutional obligations. [...] While the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence relating to MONC has been developed in the context of national government, the spirit of that jurisprudence applies to local government all the same. [...] The Bill’s proposed ‘exceptional’ MONC effectively replicates the Constitution’s provision for removing the President5 and Premiers.6 This may well attract the same drawn-out fact gathering process now germane to the process for removing the President since Economic Freedom Fighters and Others v Speaker of the National Assembly and Another.7 3.4. [...] First, when the Constitutional Court considered calls to force the Speaker of the National Assembly to conduct a vote on a MONC in the President in secret, it held that it was by no means clear when a particular voting procedure would best hold public representatives accountable.

Authors

HSF

Pages
7
Published in
South Africa

Table of Contents