cover image: TOWARDS IDENTIFYING GOOD PRACTICES IN DENIAL OF ENTRY OF

20.500.12592/4lbq8xm

TOWARDS IDENTIFYING GOOD PRACTICES IN DENIAL OF ENTRY OF

16 Sep 2024

Under US laws, the scope of persons who may be denied entry due to their involvement in corruption is defined in the following way: 30 Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border checks, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreeme. [...] Pursuant to article 6.1 (d) of the Schengen Borders Code, the entry can be denied if the alert for the purposes of refusing entry has been issued in the SIS in respect of this person.42 According to article 24.2 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018, Member States shall enter an alert for refusal of entry in the following cases: […] (a) a th. [...] Another good practice is the exchange of information under the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America for the Sharing of Visa and Immigration Information. [...] 66 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in cri minal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. [...] Is the list of contact persons who are in charge of denial of entry available to you? If yes, please provide the text of the legal provisions (in English) in respect of the designation of contact persons and/or the exchange of information procedure.

Authors

Martha Annette Stinnes

Pages
24
Published in
Austria

Table of Contents