Under US laws, the scope of persons who may be denied entry due to their involvement in corruption is defined in the following way: 30 Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border checks, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreeme. [...] Pursuant to article 6.1 (d) of the Schengen Borders Code, the entry can be denied if the alert for the purposes of refusing entry has been issued in the SIS in respect of this person.42 According to article 24.2 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1861 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018, Member States shall enter an alert for refusal of entry in the following cases: […] (a) a th. [...] Another good practice is the exchange of information under the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America for the Sharing of Visa and Immigration Information. [...] 66 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in cri minal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. [...] Is the list of contact persons who are in charge of denial of entry available to you? If yes, please provide the text of the legal provisions (in English) in respect of the designation of contact persons and/or the exchange of information procedure.
Authors
Related Organizations
- Pages
- 24
- Published in
- Austria
Table of Contents
- TOWARDS IDENTIFYING GOOD 1
- PRACTICES IN DENIAL OF ENTRY OF 1
- CORRUPT INDIVIDUALS AND THE 1
- POTENTIAL ROLE OF THE GLOBE 1
- NETWORK IN FACILITATING THE 1
- EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION IN 1
- THIS AREA 1
- September 2024 1
- Beijing China 1
- Executive summary 3
- List of abbreviations 5
- I. Introduction 6
- II. Denial of entry to corrupt individuals general overview 6
- II.1 Reasons for introducing denial of entry to persons involved in corruption. 6
- II.2 International discussion 7
- II.3 Persons who may be denied entry due to their involvement in corruption. 8
- II.4 Forms of decision and procedures affected. 10
- III. Good practices related to legal frameworks providing for denial of entry 11
- III.1 General approaches to regulation of denial of entry and relevant good practices. 11
- III.2 Good practices related to legislations providing for denial of entry substantive law 12
- III.3 Good practices related to legislation providing for denial of entry procedural law 16
- IV. Good practices related to exchange of information for denial of entry to 18
- IV.1 Good practices related to domestic exchange of information for denial of entry to 19
- IV.2 Good practices related to international exchange of information for denial of entry to 20
- V. Conclusion 22
- Annex I. Questionnaire 23
