Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/10/16
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Mongolia - MN Export Development Project
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 20
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- MN-Mongolia Export Development Project -- P147438
- Unit Owning
- EFI-EAP-FCI-Finance-1 (EEAF1)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
- Development of a New Line of Export Finance Products 2
- Export Competitiveness and Market Access Enhancement 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Strengthening Certification Services and Quality Management 3
- Project Implementation Support 3
- Project Cost. 3
- Financing. 3
- Borrower Contribution. 3
- Dates. 3
- Restructuring. 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
- Rationale 4
- Binding Constraints to Development. 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Country Development Priorities. 5
- World Bank Group Country Strategy. 5
- Rating 5
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
- OBJECTIVE 1 5
- Objective 5
- Rationale 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- Theory of Change. 6
- Outputs. 6
- Outcomes. 6
- Rating 6
- OBJECTIVE 1 REVISION 1 6
- Revised Objective 6
- Revised Rationale 6
- Theory of Change. 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Outputs. 7
- Outcomes. 7
- Revised Rating 7
- OBJECTIVE 2 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Objective 8
- Rationale 8
- Theory of Change. 8
- Outputs. 8
- Outcomes. 8
- Rating 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- OBJECTIVE 2 REVISION 1 9
- Revised Objective 9
- Revised Rationale 9
- Theory of Change. 9
- Outputs. 9
- Outcomes. 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Revised Rating 10
- OBJECTIVE 3 10
- Objective 10
- Rationale 10
- Rating 10
- OBJECTIVE 3 REVISION 1 10
- Revised Objective 10
- Revised Rationale 10
- Theory of Change. 10
- Outputs. 10
- Outcomes. 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- Revised Rating 11
- OVERALL EFFICACY 11
- Rationale 11
- Overall Efficacy Rating Primary Reason 11
- OVERALL EFFICACY REVISION 1 11
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rationale 11
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rating 11
- 5. Efficiency 11
- Economic Efficiency. 11
- Operational Efficiency. 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- Efficiency Rating 12
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 12
- 6. Outcome 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- Outcome Rating 13
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 13
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- Analytical Underpinning. 14
- Lessons from Related World Bank Operations. 14
- Operational Links and Mitigation Measures. 14
- Shortcomings at Entry. 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 15
- Supervision. 15
- Adaptation. 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- Quality of Supervision Rating 16
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 16
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- ME Quality Rating 17
- 10. Other Issues 17
- Environmental Safeguards. 17
- Social Safeguards. 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
- Procurement. 18
- Financial Management. 18
- 11. Ratings 18
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 18
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 19
- 12. Lessons 19
- Export development and SME development require more than interventions at the enterprise level and would benefit from an enabling business environment buttressed by policy reform. 19
- Export development projects need to consider the role of private enterprises and organizations in the export drive. 19
- Export development projects would benefit from the careful design scoping and piloting of planned interventions. 19
- 13. Assessment Recommended 19
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 19
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 20