The recent Supreme Court decision ending Chevron deference has affirmed the primacy of the courts in rulemaking by agencies implementing congressional legislation that may be ambiguous. The Supreme Court’s decision is likely to have implications for the extent to which the US Department of Agriculture and other agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency have flexibility in rulemaking that affects the agricultural sector. The US Department of Agriculture recently proposed new rules that would apply to contracting and other issues associated with livestock marketing channels under provisions of the 1921 Packers and Stockyards Act, increasing the likelihood of costly litigation.
Authors
- Pages
- 4
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- Chevron Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council 1
- Chevron 1
- Chevron Loper Bright Enterprises v. 1
- Raimondo Chevron 1
- Key Points 1
- The recent Supreme Court decision ending Chevron deference has affirmed the primacy of the 1
- The Supreme Courts decision is likely to have implications for the extent to which the US Depart- 1
- The US Department of Agriculture recently proposed new rules that would apply to contract- 1
- Federal Register 2
- Rulemaking Under the 1921 Packer and Stockyards Act 2
- Chevron 2
- Federal Register 2
- Summary 3
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo 3
- Federal Register 3
- About the Authors 3
- Notes 3