cover image: International Cyber Incidents: On the Question of Public Attribution

International Cyber Incidents: On the Question of Public Attribution

4 Nov 2024

Introduction We live in an age of cyber 'unpeace' [1] where modern mid-spectrum rivalry “fits neither the destructive criteria [and violence] of war nor the acceptable boundaries of peace.” [2] The blurring of cyber boundaries brought about by asymmetry allows both states and nation-states to attain international economic and geopolitical objectives without engaging in traditional kinetic warfare. This new reality compels holistic and cohesive thinking from policymakers across the world on how to exploit opportunities and minimise threats posed by the pervading uncertainty of cyber ‘unpeace’. International cyber operations, frequently undertaken by states, state-backed actors, or independent non-state actors, provide asymmetric advantages to entities that may not boast traditional military or technological power. The many challenges of effectively attributing attacks to a perpetrator or group compounds geopolitical uncertainty.
india digital economy cyber security non-state actors policymakers cyberattacks emerging technologies forensic analysis cyber operations botnets cyber and technology spoofing future warfare mid-spectrum rivalry geopolitical objectives public attribution kinetic warfare cyber boundaries cyber unpeace proxy networks obfuscation techniques technical constraints

Authors

Arindrajit Basu

Related Organizations

Attribution
Arindrajit Basu, “International Cyber Incidents: On the Question of Public Attribution,” ORF Issue Brief No. 748 , November 2024, Observer Research Foundation.
Pages
20
Published in
India

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All