Additional Financing Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) - Education Emergency Response in Afghanistan (EERA) - P178758 - AF No: 1 (English)

Files

Table of Contents

• 1 IntroductionProject Description 3
• 1.1 Introduction 3
• 1.2 Project Description 3
• 1.3 Methodology 5
• Openness. 6
• Cultural appropriateness. 6
• Conflict sensitivity. 6
• Informed participation and feedback. 6
• Inclusivity. 6
• Gender sensitivity. 6
• 2 Brief Summary of Previous Stakeholder Engagement Activities 7
• 3 Stakeholder Identification and Analysis 8
• 3.1 Affected Parties 10
• 3.2 Other Interested Parties 11
• 3.3 Disadvantaged vulnerable individuals or groups 11
• Table 1 UNICEF Tailored Stakeholder Engagement Measures DisadvantagedVulnerable Individuals or Groups 12
• 3.4 Summary of Project Stakeholder Needs 14
• Table 2 Project Stakeholder Needs Summary 14
• 4 Stakeholder Engagement Program 16
• 4.1 Purpose and Timing of Stakeholder Engagement Program 16
• 4.2 UNICEF Proposed Strategy for Information Disclosure 16
• Table 3 UNICEF Proposed Strategy for Information Disclosure 18
• 4.3 Proposed Strategy for Consultation 21
• Table 4 UNICEF Proposed Strategy for Consultation 21
• Education 21
• Table 4.1 WFP Proposed Strategy for Consultation for School Feeding Component 2.5 23
• Education 23
• 4.4 UNICEF Proposed strategy to incorporate the view of vulnerable groups 25
• 4.5 Timelines 25
• 4.6 Review of Comments 25
• 4.7 Future Phases of Project 25
• 5 UNICEF Resources and Responsibilities for Implementing Stakeholder 26
• Engagement Activities 26
• 5.1 Roles and Responsibilities 26
• 5.2 Resources Required 26
• Table 5 Budget Required for Stakeholder Engagement Activities 26
• Activity Cost 26
• Official coordination meeting Implementing partners 0 embedded within planned activity budget within AF 26
• Official Meetings and workshops at national zonal provincial levels 26
• 0 embedded within planned activity budget within 26
• Community Meetings In person and over the phone involving local actors influencers and beneficiaries representing different communities 50000.00 26
• Collaboration with community leaders and School Management Shuras in targeted locations to inform about project components and gain support of community members 26
• 0 embedded within planned activity budget within AF 26
• 0 embedded within cross sectoral allocation which funds communication 26
• Activity Cost 27
• Social Media Facebook Twitter etc. Posting project ESF documents videos introducing the project and other promotional materials and monitoring comments 27
• 0 embedded within cross sectoral allocation which funds communication 27
• Satisfaction survey to measure the level of satisfaction on services delivery among beneficiaries under the AF EERA. 0 embedded within planned activity budget within AF 27
• Printing project brief GRM posters and GRM fliers for community distribution 50000.00 27
• WFP Grievance and Community engagement costs 27
• 0 embedded within 27
• Component 2.5 27
• Total 100000.00 27
• 6 UNICEF Grievance Redress Mechanism GRM 27
• 6.1 Objective 27
• 6.2 GRM Structure 27
• 6.3 Lessons learned 29
• 6.4 AWAAZ Afghanistan 29
• 6.5 Handling SEASH grievances 29
• 6.6 Capacity building Awareness 32
• 6.7 GRM Reporting 32
• 7 WFP Grievance Redressal Mechanism for component 2.5 32
• 7.1 Labour Grievance Mechanism 35
• 7.2 Grievance Mechanism for SEA Grievances 35
• 8 Monitoring and Reporting 37
• 8.1 Involvement of Stakeholders in Monitoring Activities 37
• 8.2 Reporting back to stakeholder groups 37