Hate speech on digital platforms manifests itself in ways that need to be addressed both in practice and on a policy level, taking Nordic (media) policies into novel areas. For this chapter, I analysed and compared policy documents discussing hatespeech from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, with a focus on how hatespeech is defined, the perceived harmful functions of hate speech, and the suggested remedies. The analysis shows that hate speech is perceived to endanger societies’ democratic functions, public debate, and freedom of speech. Hate speech targetsspecific minorities and especially those in public positions or participating inpublic debate. The suggested remedies correspond with media welfare state ideals: increased collaboration between all relevant parties, state support for both citizens and media, and adjustments of existing laws. The role of online platforms is crucial, but concrete measures to hold them responsible still wait for the implementation of the European Union’s Digital Services Act legislation.
Authors
- ISBN
- 978-91-88855-88-6 (print) 978-91-88855-89-3 (electronic) 978-91-88855-90-9 (electronic)
- OAI
- oai:DiVA.org:norden-13059
- Published in
- Nordicom
- Responsible organisation
- Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordic Information Centre for Media and Communication Research (NORDICOM)
- URN
- urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva-13059
- Year
- 2024
- pages
- 71-94